No. CT-2449-22
Div. V
PLAINTIFF‘S RESPONSE(S) TO DEFENDANT HOLT’S INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
1. Comes now Plaintiff, Hwang(Pro Se) for submitting this PLAINTIFF‘S RESPONSE(S) TO DEFENDANT HOLT’S INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF, and alleges, states, or/and answers the following:
2. Plaintiff respectfully submits his response(s) to this Honorable Court.
3. Plaintiff prays that this Honorable Court award such other relief, at law or in equity, as to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled or the Court may find appropriate/just/proper.
Respectfully submitted,
Hwang
Dated: March 23, 2023
=========================================================
PLAINTIFF‘S RESPONSE(S) TO DEFENDANT HOLT’S INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
=========================================================
1. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1:
Name: Hwang
Informal name: Hwang’s former spouse and family-in-law called him as “Pxxxxxn.“
Current address of residence: Plaintiff cannot specify his current address of residence because of the possibility of additional exposure of crimes(felonies).
Plaintiff lives alone right now because of the car accidents.
Plaintiff is self-employed.
Plaintiff cannot organize, as of right now, the addresses of residence for the past ten(10) years because he continued/continues to move again and again because of the car accidents and their related crimes(felonies).
2. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 2:
Those who were at the scene of the car accident (Defendant and her passengers/ reference: police report)
The police officer who was at the scene right after the car accident(xxxxxxxxxx Police Department/ reference: police report)
Medical professionals who were at the xxxxxxx Hospital(reference: medical records)
An attorney at xxxxxx Law Firm
3. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
Medical professionals who were at the xxxxxxx Hospital(reference: medical records)
4. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 4:
Plaintiff didn’t consume such things at all.
5. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5:
Reference: police report
6. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 6:
Various kinds of sufferings (non-economic and/or economic sufferings)
Reference: medical records
7. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7:
Reference: medical records
Plaintiff would like to investigate, during the process of discovery, the deposition(s), and/or the trial(s), why he could not have additional medical check-ups and treatments.
8. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 8:
Reference: medical records
9. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 9:
Plaintiff is self-employed.
10. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 10:
Reference: medical records
11. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 11:
Reference: medical records
12. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 12:
Reference: medical records
13. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 13:
Plaintiff filed 4 civil complaints until now because of the car accidents.
14. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 14:
Plaintiff does not have any criminal records.
15. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 15:
Reference: police report
16. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 16:
Reference: police report
17. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 17:
It can depend on the situations or/and circumstances.
18. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 18:
Reference: police report
19. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 19:
Reference: police report
20. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 20:
Plaintiff is self-employed.
The industry of plaintiff’s job: Independent Journalism & Videography
The title of plaintiff’s job: Producer
21. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 21:
Plaintiff graduated from a university in the Republic of Korea(South Korea).
Plaintiff’s academic major was English. His minor was law.
Plaintiff served for the ROK Army for 26 months.
Plaintiff’s military specialty was transportation.
22. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 22:
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
23. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 23:
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
24. PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 24:
Plaintiff does not use such social media service on the regular basis.
Plaintiff would like to use them when he can, but he could not use them both because of his habits and because of the car accidents.
=======================================================
PLAINTIFF‘S RESPONSE(S) TO DEFENDANT HOLT’S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
=======================================================
1. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1:
Reference: police report
2. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2:
Reference: medical records
3. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
Plaintiff is self-employed.
The industry of plaintiff’s job: Independent Journalism & Videography
The title of plaintiff’s job: Producer
4. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4:
Plaintiff is self-employed.
Plaintiff couldn’t/cannot organize such materials/data because of the car accidents and their related crimes(felonies).
5. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
6. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 6:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
7. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7:
Plaintiff is a Pro Se litigant.
Plaintiff filed the civil complaint(s) by himself and for himself.
8. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 8:
Plaintiff is a Pro Se litigant.
Plaintiff filed the civil complaint(s) by himself and for himself.
Plaintiff did not try to contact or/and communicate Defendant(s) about the Lawsuit.
Plaintiff served the copies of the civil complaint and summons.
9. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 9:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
10. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 10:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
11. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 11:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
12. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 12:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
13. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 13:
There was no REQUEST NO. 13 in the document.
It seems to be an error by the counsel(s).
14. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 14:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
15. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 15:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
16. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 16:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
17. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 17:
Reference: police report Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
18. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 18:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
Plaintiff could not organize, until now, such materials/data because of the car accidents and their related crimes(felonies).
19. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 19:
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
Plaintiff could not organize, until now, such materials/data because of the car accidents and their related crimes(felonies).
20. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 20:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Plaintiff’s automobile insurance company was xxxxx xxxx automobile insurance at the time of the accident.
Plaintiff’s health insurance company was xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx at the time of the accident.
Plaintiff can try to submit additional documents when necessary.
21. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 21:
Plaintiff is self-employed.
The industry of plaintiff’s job: Independent Journalism & Videography
The title of plaintiff’s job: Producer
22. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 22:
Reference: PLAINTIFF‘S RESPONSE(S) TO DEFENDANT HOLT’S INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
23. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 23:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
24. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 24:
Reference: police report
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
25. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 25:
The opposing counsel(s)/parties already have them because plaintiff received such documents from them.
Plaintiff did not receive anything from any other indivisual(s).
26. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 26:
The opposing counsel(s)/parties already have them because Plaintiff received such documents from them.
Plaintiff did not receive anything from any other indivisual(s).
27. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 27:
Plaintiff’s health insurance company was xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx at the time of the accident.
Plaintiff can try to submit additional documents when necessary.
28. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 28:
Reference: police report
29. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 29:
Plaintiff had/has been contacted both by the attorney at xxxxxx Law Firm and/or by the indivisual(s) who seemed to be related to Defendant(s).
There was no serious evaluation of the condition of the property.
Counsel(s) for Defendant(s) can try to contact them mentioned above when necessary.
30. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 30:
Plaintiff does not use such social media service on the regular basis.
Plaintiff would like to use them when he can, but he could not use them both because of his habits and because of the car accidents.
31. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 31:
Plaintiff does not use such social media service on the regular basis.
Plaintiff would like to use them when he can, but he could not use them both because of his habits and because of the car accidents.
32. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 32:
Plaintiff does not use such social media service on the regular basis.
Plaintiff would like to use them when he can, but he could not use them both because of his habits and because of the car accidents.
33. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 33:
Plaintiff couldn’t/cannot organize such materials/data because of the car accidents and their related crimes(felonies).
Plaintiff can try to submit additional documents when necessary.
34. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 34:
Reference: medical records
Reference: plaintiff’s other lawsuits/litigations
. [The End]
This is the end of the documents. The total pages are 14 pages.
Written by Mr. Hwang
Published: March 23, 2023